IWC Schaffhausen
Collectors
Forum
  • Categories

  • New to the forum
  • Collector Articles
  • News
  • Community
  • Moderator articles
  • Contemporary timepieces
  • Movements and technical details
  • Vintage timepieces
  • About IWC
  • Gallery
  • Archive

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Weibo
  • Home
  • Archive
  • A significant difference
  1. Threads
  2. Archive
chevron_left Archive

A significant difference

  • forum 6 replies
  • last reply by Isobars 22 Nov 2008
  • Last
  • link
    HEBE
    Master 1867 posts
    22 Nov 2008, 11:40 p.m. 22 Nov 2008, 11:40 p.m.
    link

    With the new anti-reflecting glass, the KLEINE PORTUGIESER is really fantastic. I think, the photos show the tremendous difference between the old - and the new glass.

    Regards

    Heiko

    h-bertram.homepage.t-online.de/3531-glas.jpg

  • link
    Isobars
    Master 6256 posts
    22 Nov 2008, 11 a.m. 22 Nov 2008, 11 a.m.
    link

    Exactly Heiko >>>

    This is the brilliant morning July Sun. Great photos!
    --
    Best from Isobars.

    i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee278/RWK29/UTC4.jpg

  • link
    Christopher Porreca
    Connoisseur 304 posts
    22 Nov 2008, 9:30 p.m. 22 Nov 2008, 9:30 p.m.
    link

    Did IWC do that for you? Nice UTC Isobars!

  • link
    Mr. Andrew Thomas
    Master 5816 posts
    23 Nov 2008, 8:05 a.m. 23 Nov 2008, 8:05 a.m.
    link

    A significant difference -but

    perhaps not the ideal experiment to show the difference between the two.......i.e. the ideal is an example of old and new glass versions of the watch.

    A reflective glass on top of a non-reflective may even help the view of the non-reflective.....

    Agree - excellent and signficant visual difference.

    Andrew

  • link
    HEBE
    Master 1867 posts
    22 Nov 2008, 1:25 p.m. 22 Nov 2008, 1:25 p.m.
    link

    Like this ? But the result is the same.

    Greetings

    Heiko

    h-bertram.homepage.t-online.de/safirglas.jpg

  • link
    Dirk Janssen
    Master 761 posts
    23 Nov 2008, 1:20 a.m. 23 Nov 2008, 1:20 a.m.
    link

    Interesting

    Thanks for showing us - though I have never felt the need to replace the glass of mine.

    Dirk

  • link
    Isobars
    Master 6256 posts
    22 Nov 2008, 5 p.m. 22 Nov 2008, 5 p.m.
    link

    Yes Christopher, I would not let any one other >>>

    then the right people at IWC domestic and IWC/Schaffhausen touch any of my pieces.

    I am extremely pleased with the work preformed. Better then new because, it is improved technology.

    Cheers from Isobars.

There are no more posts in this thread.

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Weibo
Contact Our Concierge
  • Contact Us
  • +1-800-432-9330
Go to iwc.com
  • Conditions of Sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use