• Master
    10 Dec 2015, 1:05 p.m.

    Interesting, never seen before with such a dial.

    Regards

    HEBE

  • Master
    10 Dec 2015, 3:55 p.m.

    Nice dial! What makes the watch anti magnetic, does it have an anti magnetic cage?

    Kind regards,
    Paul

  • Master
    10 Dec 2015, 8:24 p.m.

    Very cool dial and the sword-shaped hands are quite nice too.

  • Master
    10 Dec 2015, 8:57 p.m.

    There is no faraday cage in either of these watches and I am not entirely sure how their anti-magnetic, or better magnetic resistance, characteristic is achieved, and to what degree. I assume it is through the materials used in the escapement parts.i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii236/costadaguia/FullSizeRender-1_zpsrwqckgoi.jpg

  • Master
    10 Dec 2015, 11:25 p.m.

    Interesting how the bezel is bolder than the one on the left. You have identified its age and will find out more in time. So the case is different and I would imagine has a different model number to the other small sec model. Nice find.

  • Master
    11 Dec 2015, 1:45 a.m.

    Nice Tony! Very cool and another nice find. You must be pleased!

  • Master
    11 Dec 2015, 9:59 a.m.

    According to the IWC Archives the watch was sold October 4th 1936 to Nowotny, but there is no reference number.
    Does Nowotny ring a bell to anyone?
    i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii236/costadaguia/IMG_3759_zpsg1sm7yuj.jpg

  • Master
    11 Dec 2015, 11:32 a.m.

    Thank you for your explanation. I wonder whether there is somebody who knows how the anti magnetic property was achieved: I feel assured that the message on the dial is not a false advertisement. There was no silicium balance spring in those days, it must have been a feature that might be quite common now, thus not mentioned anymore, but special in those days: a bit like the watches that were shock resistant. Is the feature used in this watch the same as used now in most IWC watches without an antimagnetic cage? That would be nice to know, for instance when discussing the current Ingenieurs without such a cage: they might still be protected until a certain level of magnetism.

    Kind regards,
    Paul

  • 11 Dec 2015, 3:45 p.m.

    Some antimagnetic (actually amagnetic) watches in the 1930s used gold parts on the escapement to be antimagnetic. A lot of metals to my knowledge don't attract magnetism, at least to some degree. The real question is how much antimagnetism is achieved, but back in the the 1930s they didn't have MRIs, computers, scanning machines at airports, etc.

    I don't know what metals were used here, except the balance wheel, like almost all modern watches, used Glucydur which is beryllium bronze; an alloy of beryllium, copper and iron. In addition the hairspring should be Nivarox, a special alloy of nickel iron. Both Glucydur and Nivarox are antimagnetic.

  • Master
    12 Dec 2015, 7:28 a.m.

    That would be nice to know, for instance when discussing the current Ingenieurs without such a cage: they might still be protected until a certain level of magnetism.

    To the best of my knowledge the only Ingenieur without a faraday cage that is amagnetic is the Ref 3508 500,000 A/m with cal. 375. To achieve this level of resistance to magnetization, IWC used lessons learned with cal 3755AM of the the Ref. 3519 BUND.
    Those lessons appear to have been forgotten. The recent Ingenieurs without a faraday cage are as amagnetic as any Portofino. The Ingenieur brand has been eviscerated.

  • Master
    12 Dec 2015, 8:59 a.m.

    Let´s make it a little bit more complicated, Antonio :-)

    500.000 A/m => Should be resistent against magnetism.

    AMAG => Should not contain any ferromagnetic/paramagnetic material.

    That are totally different requirements !

    Only some parts of the movements are similar or identical ?!

    Lets have a look to the ETA calibre 2892-A2 based movements.

    The shape looks similar, but the materials of board, etc. are different, steel and alloy of brass.

    BTW many Ing. models have shock absorbers, the 500.00 A/m has none.

    Regards

    HEBE

    derjonk.de/lizard/amag-500-cal.jpg

  • Master
    12 Dec 2015, 9:51 a.m.

    Thanks Hebe. It is always better to use precise language.

  • Master
    12 Dec 2015, 10:04 a.m.

    It´s just, I am still interested in this topic and those watches :-)

    And this is the new master of magnetic protection.

    It´s aprox. > 1200.000 A/m

    derjonk.de/lizard/15000-gauss.jpg

  • Master
    12 Dec 2015, 10:35 a.m.

    I know. I've been seriously tempted, and may eventually cave in. It is a wonderful watch any way you look at it.
    I wonder why IWC not only gave up increasing the magnetic resistance of the Ingenieur but actually decided that abandoning its fundamental property was s good idea.

  • Master
    12 Dec 2015, 10:43 a.m.

    Totally agree.

    But IWC has still the master of anti magnetic PWs.

  • Master
    12 Dec 2015, 11:48 a.m.

    My guess is that it was a choice between two alternatives:
    [ul]
    [li]a strong anti-magnetic watch that was quite thick;[/li]
    [li]a thinner watch without strong anti-magnetic properties.[/li]
    [/ul]
    Trying to estimate what would sell more, IWC apparently chose the second alternative, thereby reasoning that hardly anybody would be interested in the strong anti-magnetic properties at the expense of a thicker watch.

    But instead of guessing, you could ask IWC in January at the SIHH, where quite likely some new pilot's watches will have strong anti-magnetic properties and some will not.

    I have a rather thin non-IWC divers watch where the anti-magnetic properties are supplied by a silicon balance spring, thereby giving the opportunity to admire the beautiful movement through a back crystal. I wonder whether IWC could choose this solution in the nearby future. How strong the anti-magnetic properties are I don't know, but quite probably more than enough for my everyday life and my incidental airport visit.

    Kind regards,
    Paul