• Apprentice
    19 Jun 2021, 3:50 p.m.

    I am observing with scepticism that many people prefer to put their wonderful
    micromechanical masterpieces in the safe rather than wear them.

    For me, this is unthinkable, because these watches were made for the place on
    our wrists.

    And then they are supposed to look like this after almost 16 years.

    Now this beauty and loyal companion is in the Schaffhausen-Spa to get a
    technical and optical lifting.

    Cheers,

    Sascha

  • Master
    19 Jun 2021, 6:25 p.m.

    I love the lived in look of a worn 3227 - trying a novel crown guard here ;-)

  • Master
    20 Jun 2021, 7:27 a.m.

    This discussion was held here several times.

    All what you say is correct but over the years fahion and taste changed. For
    half a century a wristwatch should look as new. As a result IWC , when
    servicing a watch, did everything to bring the watch in shiny new condition,
    including a thorough polish.

    Now there are brands which prudently ask their customers : polish or not? New
    crystal or not?

    I have seen that a wristwatch loses value by polishing to half of its value.
    And then we are talking about ten thousands of dollars.

    Collectors make up names to smooth over a terrible condition :

    A tropical dial = a dial ruined by moist.

    A spider dial = a cracked dial of which the cover layer is of bad qualty.

    A fuchsia bezel = a bezel of which the original red colour has become faint,
    too bad to be called a colour.

    All of this is cherished to the utmost and expressed in huge amounts of money.

    On the other extreme are collectors who refuse to buy a brand new watch of
    which the stickers have been removed.

    So different minds and different tastes, but what intrigues me is that most
    people, entering the world of collecting, do not like ruined watches over new
    old stock, but can be influenced by others to change their mind to the
    opposite.

    Regards,

    Adrian,

    (alwaysiwc).

  • Apprentice
    20 Jun 2021, 8:39 a.m.

    True words Adrian. I am always amazed that obvious quality defects such as
    cracked or discoloured dials lead to real price explosions for some brands.

    It seems to me that this is part of a social development. It has a lot to do
    with money and its relevance. I observe that in this day and age, many things
    are hyped for the sake of maximum return. Not only in the field of watches,
    but also in classic cars, works of art and much more. The main thing is that
    it is rare.

    A big, if not the biggest disadvantage of this development is that money seems
    to kill passion. The object itself hardly plays a role. Neither does passion
    for it. But isn't it precisely this passion and the genuine, honest interest
    in watches, for example, that forms the basis for us as collectors?
    And could we not pay the engineers and watchmakers a greater compliment if we
    passionately love and also wear the watches they create?!

    I, for one, do. And from this attitude then comes not only passion for watches
    in general, but also for a brand like IWC. I have also been wearing my Deep
    One regularly while diving for about 20 years. And I enjoy it like a little
    child on every dive.

    With this in mind, have a great weekend!

    Cheers,

    Sascha (who has this fantastic piece on his arm today).

  • Master
    20 Jun 2021, 8:42 a.m.

    A perfect analysis, Sascha.

    Adrian.

  • Master
    24 Jun 2021, 2:59 p.m.

    Good points Sacha and Adrian, love your watches too! I'm somewhat carefull
    with my watches, but all get more than enough wristtime.

    Regards, Bob