This discussion was held here several times.
All what you say is correct but over the years fahion and taste changed. For
half a century a wristwatch should look as new. As a result IWC , when
servicing a watch, did everything to bring the watch in shiny new condition,
including a thorough polish.
Now there are brands which prudently ask their customers : polish or not? New
crystal or not?
I have seen that a wristwatch loses value by polishing to half of its value.
And then we are talking about ten thousands of dollars.
Collectors make up names to smooth over a terrible condition :
A tropical dial = a dial ruined by moist.
A spider dial = a cracked dial of which the cover layer is of bad qualty.
A fuchsia bezel = a bezel of which the original red colour has become faint,
too bad to be called a colour.
All of this is cherished to the utmost and expressed in huge amounts of money.
On the other extreme are collectors who refuse to buy a brand new watch of
which the stickers have been removed.
So different minds and different tastes, but what intrigues me is that most
people, entering the world of collecting, do not like ruined watches over new
old stock, but can be influenced by others to change their mind to the
opposite.
Regards,
Adrian,
(alwaysiwc).