• Apprentice
    20 Jun 2019, 12:33 p.m.

    I think the spec is 4 seconds a day. It is an IWC-modified ETA7750.

    Currently, fresh from an IWC full service, I am seeing 7-8 secs a day.

    The watch had been to another "trade" watchmaker previously and he got it
    within 1 second a day, so clearly this is possible. He said he was Omega
    authorised, but ultimately he was unable to fix another highly intermittent
    fault with it.

  • Graduate
    20 Jun 2019, 3:03 p.m.

    Yesterday, I had the great privilege to attend a tour through IWC's
    manufacture sites. During this, our guide said, that the IWC-standard for
    accuracy was +0 until +7 seconds within 24 hours. An IWC should never be slow.
    I think, a new watch and maybe also a freshly serviced one needs to run in and
    then becomes even more accurate. Although 7 seconds within a day with 86'400
    seconds is stunning for a mechanical timepiece. And for me, that's absolutely
    enough. I didn't buy my IWCs for knowing the time to the last second. If I
    need to know this, I look at my mobile.

    Philipp

  • Apprentice
    20 Jun 2019, 3:27 p.m.

    Would one expect the error to change over time? If so, I will leave it for a
    bit and see what happens.

    I don't exactly agree about not using it to know the time accurately, because
    the previous watchmaker had no apparent issue getting it within 1 second a
    day. I am sure some 18th century naval clock which loses a minute a day will
    be even more beautiful :)

    On another occassion, a different watch (an ETA7750 Fortis) was running 20
    secs a day slow and when I took it to one watchmaker he said the spec is 20
    secs so it would be unprofessional for him to adjust it because it meets the
    spec! I wonder if there is a bit of this happening here?

  • Apprentice
    25 Jun 2019, 11:01 a.m.

    A data point: the 7-8 secs fast has come down to 4-5 secs. Is that normal?

  • Apprentice
    27 Jun 2019, 10:36 a.m.

    Looks like this is another dead forum :)

  • Graduate
    27 Jun 2019, 12:24 p.m.

    Not neccessarily a dead forum: you will see from one of the replies above
    that +0 - +7sec is within specifications for IWC. So yours now obviously is.

  • Apprentice
    24 Jul 2019, 3:27 p.m.

    Update: the watch ended up running 8 secs/day too fast so given that it had a
    2 year warranty after that IWC repair, I sent it back to them. It came back a
    few weeks (!) later and it is now running 5 secs/day fast :)

  • Master
    24 Jul 2019, 9:09 p.m.

    Looks like you answered your question in your first post!

  • Master
    25 Jul 2019, 1:17 p.m.

    Accuracy can also be influenced by the position you put your watch in when you
    take it off at night. You can experiment a bit with this to find the position
    that compenstates the gains and losses you acquire during day time.

    Kind regards,

    Clemens

  • Apprentice
    25 Jul 2019, 3:30 p.m.

    I was aware (hence things like the tourbillon movement which takes out some of
    these errors) but this watch is never taken off.

    The reason I think IWC are intentionally not trying to get the error as low as
    possible is because at one time in the past a low cost watchmaker easily
    achieved 1 second per day and it stayed that way. Well, except for the
    intermittent fault with 3-4 secs per minute :)