• 1 Nov 2015, 10:24 a.m.

    Timepieces from the International Watch Company might command around the same price point as Rolex, but their renown in consumer circles is wholly different. Consider IWC the thinking man’s watch brand largely because the choice to buy one is deliberate, as opposed to picking a Rolex, which can be mistakenly done because it’s oftentimes the logical and popular choice for those who have the necessary capital without horological knowledge.

    Select a timepiece from IWC and you’re in elite but cult status. Their designs are classic, elegant and timeless (except for the Top Gun or Aquatimer). The Portugieser is one of their most prominent and coveted watches, and for good reason. One look at it and you realize you’ve graduated into another realm of wristwatches, one that’s subtly powerful and understatedly confident. A man who wears an IWC is not only confident in who he is, but he also has nothing to prove in the way of style. He might be a family man but one who has not lost himself in the shadow of responsibility. He’s passionate about comfort and security, typically conservative, he knows what he likes and is comfortable in his own skin. He cares little that his neighbors know nothing about the IWC name and doesn’t care to brag about his accomplishments. You might see him driving a vintage BMW 8-Series or a Saab 9-3 Viggen because he appreciates obscure finery, and his suit of choice is a crisp navy blue Brooks Brothers two-button

  • Apprentice
    1 Nov 2015, 2:08 p.m.

    Very well put!

    Having owned a couple of IWCs and a Rolex, I like them both very much. I prefer IWC as a brand, pretty much for the reasons described in the original post. However I often don't like the watches itself, for reason or another. The portugiesers and the handwound Portofinos are divine and pure class. They are classic and handsome, and technically interesting. Then, if we look at e.g. Ingenieurs and Aquatimers, the picture is a bit different. Ingenieur is a legendary watch name, that has all the potential to be a good alternative for other Genta-designed watches. Therefore I'm little sad to say none of the current inges looks good in my eyes. The ones with inhouse movements are simply too large for my wrists. The 40mm piece would be great, if it didn't have the crown guards and did have the classic I-tapisserie dial. Should IWC revise the 3239 with these changes, I think I'm among the first to buy one. The current set-up is like AP was producing only Offshores; in real life they are wise enough to continue making the classic Royal Oak too.

    I often hear the argument that there's no need to complain, given that IWC is making great classical watches in their Portuguese series. That is true, and I'm more than happy with my handwound 5454. But I think it's somehow limiting that you produce only classical dressy watches. Rolex understands this, and their classical "sports" watches most probably are a great commercial success. I believe IWC is capable of doing the same if they want to!

  • Master
    1 Nov 2015, 5:33 p.m.

    fine and very true words bas!

    regards,
    thang