• Apprentice
    20 Jan 2019, 11:26 p.m.

    I have recently found a vintage watch that has a sign Intercontinental watch
    on the dial. According to the Mikrolisk base Intercontinental Watch was a
    subbrand of IWC. It appears that the brand Intercontinental watch was
    registred in 1949. by International Watch co. (IWC)/ E.Homberger-Rauschenbach.

    The movement is signed I.C.W. and it looks a lot like Unitas 160 (see the last
    figure below).

    So, what is it? Was Intercontinental Watch for IWC something like Tudor is for
    Rolex? A cheaper subbrand. Is this an IWC movement or a version of Unitas 160?
    I would appreciate any info.

    Thanx in advance,

    Ed

    This is how the watch looks
    like:

  • Master
    25 Jan 2019, 8:55 p.m.

    I never heard or read that Intercontinal watch has anything to do with IWC.

    In the past there were cooperations with other companies such as Stauffer,
    Unitas, Zentra and IWC made movements for Cartier, Tiffany, Turler etc.

    These movements were not signed IWC but had the name of the company which
    bought them on the movement and dial.

    This movement has nothing to do with IWC and has not been not described in any
    IWC literature.

    I am sorry, but this is not IWC.

    Regards,

    Adrian,

    (alwaysiwc).

  • Graduate
    26 Jan 2019, 10:36 a.m.

    unfortunetly I do not think that is an IWC. Never heard of anything like that
    from IWC

  • Apprentice
    26 Jan 2019, 11:27 a.m.

    Thanx,

    I agree that it is not a proper IWC. However this trade mark „Intercontinental
    Watch" was registered by H.E Homberger from Schaffhausen, in 1949. My source
    is the „Indicateur Suisse" (Marque de fabrique deposees en Suisse) from 1965.
    There is also the registration number 130615. See the attached image with that
    entry. Now, we know that H.E.Homberger was the ovner of IWC in 50', so we can
    at least say that the two companies had the same owner.

    I do not know wether Mr Homberger acted on behalf of the company or on his
    own or wether we can make that distinction at all. I also know that it was not
    uncomon for the watchmaking companies to have subsidiary labels for major
    brands.

    There are may examples (Rolex/Tudor, Hamilton/Vantage, Bulova/Caravelle,
    Rado/Exacto ,...). So my guess was that Intercontinental Watch was a subsidary
    label for the IWC, and I was wondering wether IWC has any trace of that in
    their records.

  • Master
    26 Jan 2019, 12:25 p.m.

    This is a very interesting find, although I have no idea what the significance
    of this is.

    Hans-Ernst Homberger played an important role outside IWC for the Swiss watch
    industry although Schaffhausen was located outside the center of Swiss
    horology. He was a member and ambassador of several Swiss horological
    organisations

    It could be interesting to write to the curator of the IWC museum, David
    Seyffer. He might be able to find more data on this topic.

    Regards,

    Adrian,

    (alwaysiwc).

  • Apprentice
    1 Feb 2019, 6:12 p.m.

    One more thing. The movement cannot be Unitas 150 or 160 as it has a diameter
    27 or 28 mm, while Unitas 150 has a diameter of 10.5 lignes (23.3 mm)

    I cannot figure out what it is. There is no stamp below the balance, just the
    ICW sign on the bridge.