IWC Schaffhausen - Collector's Forum

IWC Schaffhausen - Collector's Forum
Collectors Forum
  • search
Home / Movements and technical details / IWC Cal. 64 Balance Staff's doubts... Please Help!
  1. Threads
  2. Movements and technical details
chevron_left Movements and technical details

IWC Cal. 64 Balance Staff's doubts... Please Help!

  • forum 6 replies
  • last reply by EmilW 30 Jan 2016
  • Last
  • link
    Mr. Emil Weis
    Apprentice 4 posts
    29 Jan 2016, 10:15 a.m. 29 Jan 2016, 10:15 a.m.
    link

    Hi everyone! I have a IWC Cal.64 12.5 lig. movement with a broken balance staff.
    s16.postimg.org/wesjxplet/IWC_Cal_64.jpg
    s18.postimg.org/vuk56b5wp/IWC_Cal_64_1.jpg
    So I just bought a new one for the actual caliber. After receiving the new balance staff I was very surprised find out... This balance staff very small for my movement (total height 357). I checked the size of my broken staff - 420 with a broken edges...
    s21.postimg.org/qs0a77zhz/Broken_Balance_staff.jpg
    Here is the balance wheel photo:
    s11.postimg.org/70pcxd8wz/IWC_64_Balance_Wheel.jpg
    Can anyone explain me what's happening? I just have no idea...
    Thanks in advance,
    Emil.

  • link
    Mr. Thomas Koenig
    Connoisseur 375 posts
    30 Jan 2016, 6:37 p.m. 30 Jan 2016, 6:37 p.m.
    link

    What you have appears to be a very early Cal. 64.

    In the course of time the movements got thinner. I assume you acquired a balance staff for a Cal. 64 post 1904, but you need one pre 1894.

    Regards

    Koenig

  • link
    Mr. Tonny Berteloot
    Moderator 3566 posts
    30 Jan 2016, 6:50 p.m. 30 Jan 2016, 6:50 p.m.
    link

    Herr Koenig is right, yours is dated 1893 , so pre 1894. Is was not uncommon that calibers were further developed but kept the same reference number.

  • link
    Mr. Emil Weis
    Apprentice 4 posts
    30 Jan 2016, 6:51 p.m. 30 Jan 2016, 6:51 p.m.
    link

    Hi, Koenig. Thanks for reply. I'll try, maybe the balance staff for Cal. 52 will fit...
    Regards,
    Emil

  • link
    Mr. Emil Weis
    Apprentice 4 posts
    30 Jan 2016, 6:53 p.m. 30 Jan 2016, 6:53 p.m.
    link

    Hi, Tonny. According to the serial number it's Cal. 52, not Cal. 64...

  • link
    Mr. Tonny Berteloot
    Moderator 3566 posts
    30 Jan 2016, 7:41 p.m. 30 Jan 2016, 7:41 p.m.
    link

    The caliber number is 96908, should be a cal 64.

  • link
    Mr. Emil Weis
    Apprentice 4 posts
    30 Jan 2016, 7:54 p.m. 30 Jan 2016, 7:54 p.m.
    link

    You're right, Thanks.
    Regards,
    Emil

There are no more posts in this thread.


SHARE

facebooktwitterpinterestLinkedInWeibo

FEEDS

RSS Feed / Atom Feed

Contact

Contact Our Concierge

Email +1-800-432-9330
Back to iwc.com
Conditions of Sale
PRIVACY POLICY
TERMS OF USE