• Apprentice
    24 Mar 2021, 6:09 p.m.

    I wonder if anyone could help with something. There is an IWC MK11 with SAAF
    markings (ONLY SAAF number, no other issue numbers). The inside caseback has a
    7 digit number (These i believe were civilian stock) and the dial has no
    military markings. I believe the AF numbers to be approx mid to late 60's,
    possibly early 70's. Does anyone know how this may have come about. Majority
    of other SAF IWC Mk 11's have multiple issuance markings, so find this
    unusual........Movement number looks like 1.8 mil and inside caseback 1.7mil.
    On asking an AD for their assistance, apparently the feedback they got was
    that it was sold in Vienna in 1983.......Any assistace would be hugely
    appreciated. Regards

  • edit

    Thread title has been changed from IXC MK11 South African Airforce.

  • Master
    25 Mar 2021, 2:50 a.m.

    Hi Matthew

    so nice that you have one of the few SAAF Mark 11 survivors. Many were
    destroyed in the early 1990s by quartermasters at the end of their service
    life (A tragic tale that I can recount to you if you don't know it)

    I cannot see the movement number, but the case was produced in 1965 and
    delivered up to 1967

    (when you give us the movement number I will give the manufacture date)

    SAAF appears to have procured 200 Mark 11s between 1961 to 1986 in 3 batches.

    Clepsydra, Cellar or other Mark 11 experts will be able to tell you more

  • Apprentice
    25 Mar 2021, 4:22 a.m.

    Thanks so much for your reply, appreciate the info you have given me. The
    movement looks to be 1.8 mil serial. What was confusing me more than anything
    was the "basic" AF number stampings vs many of the others i have seen with
    "double" engravings (British and SA). I am also wondering if SAAF procured
    these through "normal" channels or not, as a few of them seem to be civilian
    versions (Based on inside caseback number and also lack of military markings
    on the dial). I wrote a few articles on SAAF Lemania watches
    origintime.co.za/the-south-african-air-force-lemania-5012/ and
    origintime.co.za/south-african-air-force-lemania-1872/ and realise
    that the SAAF had a few strange ways of doing things, including destroying
    items that were no longer in service. I am thinking of writing another article
    on these, specifically pertaining to their use in the South African Airforce,
    so am hungry for any information on them that i may lay my hands on. Thanks
    again for your feedback.

  • Connoisseur
    25 Mar 2021, 11:25 a.m.

    Hi Matthew

    You already contacted my on MWR, but obviously my replay didn't reach you. At
    least I got no feedback.

    The numbering of the case is o.k. for what I can see. So the reply, the watch
    was sold to vienna, might result from the fact, that later on another
    movement was swapped in the case. Please provide the movement No. here or via
    PM on MWR and I can tell you more and direct you to some additional
    information.

    Regards

    Thomas Koenig

  • Apprentice
    25 Mar 2021, 6:59 p.m.

    Hi Thomas, My apologies, but didnt see a response. I will take a look on the
    forum. Thanks for the info. The movement number is 1.8 mil, which in my search
    on the internet, reveals a manufacture date of mid to late 60's. I cant help
    but think the guys at iwc are looking at something completely different as it
    was only the opinion of someone that had asked, rather than an oficial report
    from the heritage dept. Thanks again for your response.

  • Master
    25 Mar 2021, 9:26 p.m.

    "and realise that the SAAF had a few strange ways of doing things, including
    destroying
    items that were no longer in service. I am thinking of writing another
    article
    on these, specifically pertaining to their use in the South African
    Airforce,
    so am hungry for any information on them that i may lay my hands on. Thanks
    again for your feedback."

    So the story goes like this......

    The Seiko "Speedmaster" 7a28 quartz Chronograph had become the standard issue
    for pilots and the remaining Lemania 5012 and IWC Mark 11s were made available
    for purchase by SAAF personnel from the stores at the 1960s book value of 35
    South African Rand.

    These were subsequently returned to the stores and exchanged for the modern
    and more expensive Seiko 7a28!!!

    When the quartermaster realised what was happening, the remaining units, as
    well as the returned watches were destroyed and buried. Talk about buried
    treasure :'(

    As a point of reference - I recall that a Seiko Pogue cost around 200 South
    African Rand in the 1980s

  • Connoisseur
    27 Mar 2021, 10:38 a.m.

    Dear Matthew,

    I don't think IWC looked into something completely different when telling you
    the movement was sold in 1983 to Vienna. It was quite normal, that movements
    produced in the sixties were sold up to the late eighties, simply because the
    Quartz movements made it hard to sell mechanical movements already in stock.
    So many movements from the mid to late sixties were sold many years later.

    As your info, the movement is from the 1,8??.??? range is quite imprecise and
    covers nearly 100,000 movement numbers while only a two digit number has been
    used for mil. watches, your watch is at least debatable, if not for the moment
    deemed to be non-original and a civilian movement swapped in a mil. case. The
    numbers of the movements to the SAAF are known.

    Regards

    Thomas Koenig

  • Apprentice
    30 Mar 2021, 5:17 a.m.

    Hi Thomas, Thanks so much for your response. I will try and get the actual
    movement number, as i see your point regarding the small delivery of these and
    the potential number it incluves by giving you 1.8xxxx. I did however read a
    very interesting article on the MK11 that was written by the British
    Horological Society that seems to explain the caseback markings of the SAAF
    watches. I will look for the link and post it on this thread. Thanks again for
    your assistance.

    Regards

    Matthew Taylor

  • Connoisseur
    30 Mar 2021, 8:22 p.m.

    I'm one of the authors of both articles on the Mk. 11 in the HJ.

    Th. Koenig

  • Apprentice
    31 Mar 2021, 9:46 a.m.