I think that Jarrod's idea is GREAT - let's share the Bling Bling-wristshots and the Non-Bling Bling ones, in a separate thread. I dare the prediction that we will have less here - but maybe you are going to proof the opposite? ;-)
Here is my beauty - for me the best IWC currently produces.
Which ones of your IWCs follows the understatement the brand was famous for as well?
Nice. That watch is a stunner.
Love my Vintage Collection Portuguese. I'm going to assume this qualifies?
[
](s375.photobucket.com/user/noiseorchard/media/image.jpg2_zps5an5sh2a.jpg.html)
Absolutely, Jarrod! Had that one too in my collection.
Ok. Anything more than a seconds sub-dial is bling. Date windows are unacceptably bling. Power reserves are very lower middle class.
My humble offering: ding, ding.
Fantastic! Your watch is a dream, and the picture very well done! Wear it in good health!
I can't believe anyone could accuse this model as bling:
Apologies for the date window... :-)
[
](s375.photobucket.com/user/noiseorchard/media/image.jpg1_zpseeq01qp7.jpg.html)
What a great post - I now face The challenge of deciding which of my IWC comes first... For now, I think its For sure my non Bling CF3 - no?
Never mind ;-)
At least it is very demonstrative.
Aloha all -
No bling here...
I know this isn't everybody's cup of tea but to me it qualifies so I shall post it.
[
](s375.photobucket.com/user/noiseorchard/media/image.jpg1_zpstdynxzha.jpg.html)
I've only got the one - but I love it.
Apologies for date and UTC windows, but I couldn't see how this one would be a bling model.
Apologies for the twin sub-dial ..... ;)
[
](s281.photobucket.com/user/scfong/media/IWC/IMG_4664-1.jpg.html)
Cheers,
sc
Im assuming this is OK as 666AD had a date. Negatives are - no soft iron core and it's blue. I guess I just go sit in the corner now.
[
](s1335.photobucket.com/user/regnimelf3717/media/IWC/EF009083-D5FA-423D-8D40-D3CC868D7F02_zps7c0q9kuv.jpg.html)
Some very cool watches being posted. Keep them coming. Wrist shots are a good thing!!
](
