• Connoisseur
    5 Aug 2011, 11:28 a.m.

    The Ingenieur family from IWC Schaffhausen embraces titanium

    A masterpiece of precision engineering is unveiled with the launch of the new Ingenieur Double Chronograph Titanium from IWC. Despite the technical complexity of the split-seconds-hand mechanism, this masculine timepiece is one of IWC’s toughest models. Engineered to the highest quality, the watch represents a dream come true for every man who likes to live life to the full.

    Engineering is the fine art of devising smart solutions to tricky technical challenges. The new Ingenieur Double Chronograph Titanium is a triumph of this fine art by IWC Schaffhausen’s specialists. In both appearance and function, it is a worthy addition to the legendary watch family, which dates back to 1954/55.

    www.iwc.com/site_media/uploads/images/2011/08/05/IW376501_Mood_SB111.jpg

    A dream come true in titanium
    The new Ingenieur Double Chronograph Titanium from IWC Schaffhausen uses the trusted 79230 calibre, in a 45-millimetre titanium case, to create a surprisingly powerful presence. For the first time ever, the watch family has a rattrapante – in other words, a split-seconds hand. Strikingly technical in character, the newcomer is a real eye-catcher. Another “first” is the satin finish of the titanium case, with a silky-matt, gleaming surface. Further remarkable features include the five screw heads on the bezel, which are coated in diamond-like carbon (DLC for short). They blend in perfectly with the looks of the black rubber-coated push-buttons and crown protection. Vulcanization is indeed the ideal treatment to complement the chunky look and feel of the controls. The redesigned dial comes across as clear, attractive and definite. To help distinguish the displays, blue was used for the first time, creating a combination well suited to this timepiece. The subdials for hours, minutes and the small (hacking) seconds are recessed into the dial, while the luminescent material in the interstices of the rhodium-plated hands appears black. Its vital function in such a watch only emerges after dark. For reasons such as the weight and the case height of 16 millimetres, the designers left out the soft-iron inner case. The convex casing ring holds the promise of outstanding ergonomics and, weighing just
    130 grams in total, the watch is comfortable to wear. The Ingenieur Double Chronograph Titanium is certainly a match for extreme situations, with proven water-resistance to 12 bar, a sturdy Ingenieur rubber strap, sapphire glass with an antireflective coating on both sides, and screwed back and crown.

    www.iwc.com/site_media/uploads/images/2011/08/05/376501_Ingenieur_Doppelchrono_Titan_SuperSports1.jpg

    www.iwc.com/site_media/uploads/images/2011/08/05/IW376501_20112.jpg

    Features
    Mechanical chronograph movement, selfwinding, split-seconds-hand mechanism for
    intermediate timing, date and day display, small hacking seconds, black rubber-coated push-buttons and crown protection

    Movement
    Calibre: 79230
    Frequency: 28,800 A/h / 4 Hz
    Jewels: 29
    Power reserve: 44 h
    Winding: self-winding

    Watch
    Materials: case and pin buckle in titanium and rubber, black dial with white and blue hands and markers, black rubber strap Glass sapphire, antireflective coating on both sides
    Back: titanium, screw-in
    Crown: screw-in
    Water-resistant: 12 bar
    Diameter: 45 mm
    Case height: 16 mm

  • Master
    5 Aug 2011, noon

    Congratulations IWC SCHAFFHAUSEN for an Ingenieur worthy of the name, and a logical evolution of the Ref 1832 and the Ref 3227.

  • Master
    5 Aug 2011, 1:17 p.m.

    "For reasons such as the weight and the case height of 16 millimetres, the designers left out the soft-iron inner case."

    I am disappointed that a titanium Ingeniuer would be too heavy for a Faraday cage to keep with the original purpose of the Ingenieur.

    Sorry, but to me it (yet again) is an Ingenieur in name only.

    Cheers from the cellar

  • Master
    5 Aug 2011, 1:37 p.m.

    I missed that. I am on vacation mode - too relaxed. I guess. Please ignore my previous posting. I would remove it if I could.
    I second Greg's posting, and will go a step further. If it does not have a Faraday cage, or is made a-magnetic by any other means, it does not deserve the Ingenieur label. It is just another nice watch with an great movement.
    At best ts is mislabeling, at worst it may be misleading.

  • Master
    5 Aug 2011, 1:41 p.m.

    This is actually very embarrassing to me, but I must remove my Congratulations and express my disappointment for yet another (so-called) Ingenieur, that is not a-magnetic.

  • Master
    5 Aug 2011, 2:12 p.m.

    No reason at all to feel embarrassed Antonio, it is very nice and brave to do so and have the thread here, concerning the watch it is very sporty in my opinion.

  • Master
    5 Aug 2011, 10:27 p.m.

    I read your first post and my jaw dropped. Then you redeemed yourself. LOL

  • Master
    5 Aug 2011, 11:01 p.m.

    For some reason I just can't understand, I assumed the watch was a-magnetic, even though that was not specified anywhere.
    Eating humble pie in public was the only option, to "redeem myself". It serves me right, for not being thorough.

  • Insider
    6 Aug 2011, 5:50 a.m.

    As much as I'm in love with IWC I would never add this piece to my collection. It just has zero appeal. Maybe I need to see it in person....

  • Master
    6 Aug 2011, 9:45 a.m.

    As you have said, it is strange that a watch that is made of titanium is too heavy and a watch that is "only" 16mm high is too tall to accommodate a iron inner case - the 3799 Top Gun is a larger (17.8 mm tall and 46mm dia), is not exactly a light weight watch and has a soft iron inner case, you would think that if they can do it with the TG they can surely do it with a watch that has built its name on being anti-magnetic . . .

  • Insider
    6 Aug 2011, 12:55 p.m.

    While it is technically a very advanced watch, and much more acomplished than, say a ROO, I still think it is far too showy. No need for IWC to make watches that look like the fashion slaves ROO or Hublots.
    Bring me back the 3713 and 3718 any day.

  • Master
    6 Aug 2011, 2:45 p.m.

    I have no idea as to what a ROO is? Apart that is from the fictional character by AA Milne and Aussie slang use!

    PS I like the look of the watch but with reservations made above and why put a double chrono (a thick movement) in a light weight case. Surely a Ti model with or without bracelet should reflect it's toughness or it's lightness or both. So a simple auto with date, in a design more akin to a Portofino or Mk XVI without claims of being a pilot watch or AM, the Ti AT has it's use and therefore was correct. A Ti Double chrono Ingie was IMO a mistake, because it's not AM, it's got a heavy movement, in shape and size and it's a chunky case.

  • Master
    6 Aug 2011, 3:29 p.m.

    Antonio, Hari Kiri might have been your only option - had you not redeemed yourself just in the nick of time.

    As for the watch itself, it's not my cup of tea - sorry!

    Best regards
    Mark

  • Graduate
    6 Aug 2011, 3:49 p.m.

    In an earlier thread I expressed my reservations regarding its aesthetics and my concern that the design was derivative. Having now been told that it doesn't have a faraday cage I am now certain that it won't be joining my collection of proper Ingenieurs.

  • Graduate
    6 Aug 2011, 3:49 p.m.

    In an earlier thread I expressed my reservations regarding its aesthetics and my concern that the design was derivative. Having now been told that it doesn't have a faraday cage I am now certain that it won't be joining my collection of proper Ingenieurs.

  • Master
    6 Aug 2011, 4:09 p.m.

    hmm interesting. its actually smaller and heavier than the Top Gun 379901, with the same movement.
    well, in any case, I was quite wowed on first sight of the prototype, but over time that wore off.
    i1120.photobucket.com/albums/l497/vanhalen812/Flagship%20Accessories/IMG-20110709-00373.jpg

  • Master
    6 Aug 2011, 4:11 p.m.

    A ROO is an Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore.

  • Master
    6 Aug 2011, 4:12 p.m.

    Antonio, Hari Kiri might have been your only option - had you not redeemed yourself just in the nick of time.

    As for the watch itself, it's not my cup of tea - sorry!

    Best regards
    Mark