• Connoisseur
    31 Aug 2019, 6:14 p.m.

    I've been away from the forum for some time, as other interests and
    obligations pushed my pocket watch collection aside. Recently I had to develop
    a catalog of my watches for insurance purposes, and this has rekindled my
    enthusiasm.

    The core of my collection is eight complete and working Jones caliber watches
    and six working uncased Jones movements. In that group of fourteen, the
    standout is an E-grade (SN 5822) watch in a heavy, engraved 18K gold hunter
    case with a glass cover over the movement. This watch is very close to mint
    condition, and in fact I doubt that it has ever been carried or serviced. It
    was just put away and passed down through a family until I was able to buy it
    a few years ago. I have had conflicting advice about how to care for this
    watch. It runs and keeps time and it would no doubt survive quite well in the
    safe. One watchmaker friend has advised me to leave it untouched and another
    disagrees, saying that it deserves to be comprehensively refreshed and
    occasionally carried.

    I lean toward getting the watch serviced, but would those of you familiar with
    these special watches share your opinions on this issue? Show of hands:
    Service or Leave Alone?

  • Master
    31 Aug 2019, 9:48 p.m.

    If you have a competent watchmaker you trust who can service the watch, a good
    clean and lube will help keep this (I can imagine) beautiful piece in top
    condition. And yes, it does deserve to be run once in a while. Please do share
    some photos.

  • Master
    1 Sep 2019, 8:09 a.m.

    Hi Jon,

    Everything depends from the skill of the watchmaker.

    My personal experience is as follows. For a long time IWC could completely
    service a Jones caibre but now many parts are not longer available. Moreover,
    service in Schaffhausen is costly.

    So, even if a movement runs it is found out during service that balance
    staffs, escape wheel, winding mechanisme etc. are worn and have to be repaired
    or exchanged. That can only be done by a very skilled watchmaker who is able
    to work with the lathe. They can be found in the UK, more than in the US and
    Europe.

    To case a Jones movement is a complete other story. It is nearly impossible ,
    due to the aberrant size of the Jones movement, to find a fitting case in
    Europe or USA. As you know IWC never cased a Jones movement. The first half of
    the production was cased in the US, the second half by different case
    manufacturers in Europe, after F.F. Seeland had stopped export to the US. To
    make a fitting case from scratch is currently extremely expensive: at least
    3000 $ for the gold- if you chose that- and another 3000 $ for the making.
    American cases , size 16 are too small, size 18 too big. This problem can be
    solved by selecting an 18 size gold filled case from the era and making a ring
    that fills the gap between the outside diameter of the movement and the inside
    diameter of the case. Such ring has to be made customised to each watch : very
    difficult and time consuming. As a collector, one must be rather disturbed (
    as I am) to spend so much money on a Jones watch, as it does not pay back
    these costs when you sell it .

    Regards,

    Adrian,

    (alwaysiwc).

  • Connoisseur
    1 Sep 2019, 5:47 p.m.

    I appreciate these helpful replies. My watchmaker has overhauled two of my
    uncased Jones movements. He does good work and I would trust him with the
    E-grade. I only hesitate because a friend who has been a watch appraiser for
    auction houses insists that the watch is more "authentic" (and perhaps
    therefore more valuable) if the movement has never been touched since it left
    the factory. He may (or may not) be right about this, but I enjoy my watches
    when I can take them out of my pocket and watch them tick. I don't expect to
    sell this watch and I don't worry about it losing value, so I lean toward
    having it serviced so that I can use it occasionally without concern.

    In a later post I will add pictures of the watch.

  • Master
    1 Sep 2019, 6:11 p.m.

    If your watchmaker is competent, I would do the same as you suggest.

    If you are afraid about authenticy, it might be useful to contact Jones
    collectors who might have exactly that part of an 'E' movement that you need
    for restoration as it is impossible to find an NOS part after 150 years in
    Schaffhausen. Some watchmakers are magicians to copy a worn wheel, shaft or
    lever.

    I look forward to see your watch(es) here.

    Regards,

    Adrian

    (alwaysiwc).

  • Connoisseur
    1 Sep 2019, 7:02 p.m.

    Adrian,

    The issue that my appraiser friend raised is not about actually replacing an
    original part. He argues that if there is any evidence at all that the watch
    has been worked on, such as scratches or indications that screws have been
    moved, and so on, the watch is no longer "unmolested." If it runs and looks
    new (as my watch does), he says to leave it alone! I haven't heard this
    extreme argument from other watch collectors, and I do not know if it is a
    common view. For me, it seems unrealistic, but I am curious to know if others
    hold the same opinion.

    Jon

  • Master
    1 Sep 2019, 7:46 p.m.

    Hi Jon,

    For me the opinion of your friend sounds a bit strange.

    Almost all collectable pocket watches have become collectors items after
    W.W.II.

    Then they were already 70-100 years old and they were considered to be
    functional watches for daily wear.

    Even the best quality watches had been by then in the hands of watch makers
    for cleaning, service or repair and in most cases they were not returned to
    the manufacturers but handled by local watchmakers who were abundantly around
    and who were real craftsmen.

    So, to encounter an untouched watch, made in 1875 is like finding a needle in
    a haystack, I guess.

    Of course this is subjective and fashion changes over the years. Not long ago
    IWC used to restore a vintage watch in such way that it looked new. Now IWC
    asks beforehand if they should yes or no polish the case and exchange the
    dial.

    Regards,

    Adrian,

    (alwaysiwc)

  • Connoisseur
    1 Sep 2019, 8:35 p.m.

    Hi Jon!

    As long as the watch does run and the oil is not heavily gummed, I would not
    service it:

    a) With the Royal Observatory in Greenwich it is and always was a rule, not to
    service any watch except it shall be issued. To service it comprises more
    risks than chances, so the guys from the National Maritime Museum and in
    former times the guys from the chronometer department.

    b) When the watch only runs here and then and it works properly there is no
    need to service. If fthe oil begins to gum, re-consider to have it serviced.
    As Adrian said: A complete untouched watch might result in a premium (as
    watches do, which come directly from the vault of a jeweler and have never
    been sold). So why destroy the chance of achieving a premium when there is no
    need to service it? To let ir run from time to time enhances the time until
    the oil really gums.

    Regards Thomas Koenig

  • 1 Sep 2019, 8:35 p.m.

    Here are the pictures.

    I am with Adrian, I guess nobody would expect that a watch from that era is
    never been worn or serviced?

    If your are not planning to sell this one, I would get it serviced, for the
    love of seeing it ticking. It was made for that. But as Thomas says, "if it
    runs, don't touch it " is a valid idea.

    If it doesn't run, get it serviced.

  • Connoisseur
    2 Sep 2019, 2:16 a.m.

    Thanks for posting my pictures. Are there instructions for how to upload
    photographs to the forum?

    Jon

  • 2 Sep 2019, 1:17 p.m.

    On the top of your screen when writing a post, you see the uplaod button,

    click it, chose your file from your harddrive, send it to the server, then you
    will see a preview, then push OK and that's it.

  • Master
    2 Sep 2019, 5:18 p.m.

    Jon,

    I forgot to ask.

    Does your 'E'beauty have an IWC signed case?

    Adrian.

  • Connoisseur
    2 Sep 2019, 6:08 p.m.

    Adrian,

    No, there is no IWC mark or logo on the case. It has an 18K mark and the
    number 16246 on both the front and back covers. In addition, on the back cover
    there is the word WARRANTED and beneath that an oval with two stars and the
    number 18. Under that number is what I think is the casemaker 's title,
    starting, I think, with the letters CA, but the name is imperfectly stamped
    and even with the loupe I can't be sure what it says. With a macro lens I may
    be able to decipher it.

    When I look very closely, I can see some very faint code marks left by
    watchmakers that I had not noticed earlier. My impression that the movement
    has neverbeen touched is wrong! It has been serviced before, and I
    will not hesitate to have it done again.

    It's good that I rejoined the forum. I know more about this watch now than I
    did a week ago!

    Jon

  • Master
    3 Sep 2019, 4:40 p.m.

    Jon,

    It is nice to see on the forum collectors who appreciate calibre Jones p.w.'s.

    There are few and certainly those with 14 Jones watches and movements are
    rare.

    I also saw your name cited by Alan Myers in the 'Jones book'.

    Regards,

    Adrian.

  • Master
    3 Sep 2019, 7:23 p.m.

    A few photos of my Pattern R Jones that was recently serviced. After a clean,
    oil and regulation, this 140 year old beauty averaged +1.1 seconds per day
    over a two week period!