• 19 Apr 2020, 1:36 p.m.

    As some of you know, I am collecting pocketwatches, IWC only.

    Far from saying that my collection is a museum collection but I am proud to
    have found some nice and rare pieces over time.

    Some of the pocketwatches are common, easy to find on the market, sometimes in
    better condition than mine, but some I have are gems.

    So in these crazy times, as the museum in Schaffhausen is closed, why not open
    one here on the forum.

    As long as the museum is closed, I will post here daily a pocketwatch from my
    collection.

    I hope I don't run out of pieces before the virus is beaten. Fingers crossed
    for all of us.

    I will post them in a random order, with some comments, feel free to join.

    Keep safe all.

    DAY 29 : Cal 2002, Quartz electronic, also known as Beta 21

    What is this ? Is it human ? Can it fly ? Is it an UFO ?

    No, it is just another pocketwatch in my collection.

    I have shown some rare and very rare old pocketwatces so far, but this one was
    sold August 1, 1974 in Zurich.

    A younger pocketwatch but one seldom seen.

    It has a steel case that expresses perfectly the novelty, the historic
    importance of the caliber. It is the Quartz electronic, with the caliber Beta
    21, called the IWC cal 2001 ( and later Beta 22 and IWC cal 2002 ).

    The watches came is steel and gold cases.

    The cal Beta 21 was developped by Centre Electronique Horloger laboratories in
    Neuchatel (CEH)

    The Centre Electronique Horloger ( CEH ) was an organization founded
    to produce electronic watches in Switzerland.

    The CEH was a consortium of 20 Swiss watch manufacturers, the Centre
    Electronique Horloger was founded in 1962 and based in Neuchatel. Foundation
    of the CEH was driven by Ebauches SA and the FH. The best-known product of the
    CEH was the beta family of quartz watch movements that would enable the Swiss
    to compete with Japanese and American quartz watches. The production beta 21
    movement was launched in 1970, following prototypes produced from 1967.

    More info about that history can be found here

    an article by Armin H. Frei, LSMFormer Research Staff Member Centre
    Electronique Horloger

    You can find Beta 21 movements in Rolex, Patek, Omega,... too.

    Watches featuring the Beta 21 calibre movement were only produced for about
    five years. When the last ones left the factory they were already obsolete and
    far too expensive.

    To have an idea of the cost of the wristwatches ( since I haven,'t found the
    prices of the pocketwatches ) in 1972
    a gold Yacht Club on a strap sold for 1900 DM
    a steel Yacht Club on a strap sold for 690 DM
    a steel Aquatitmer, ref. 1812, on a strap sold for 655 DM
    --and in 1972 this model, Ref. 3070, with strap --get this-- sold for 4675
    DM.

    Here is a picture from an old catalogues

    And here are these on my desk

    Some more technical info in a post by Jack Freedman :

    IWC caliber: 2001 (CEH BETA 21)

    Type of movement: first quartz-movement used by IWC
    Production: started 1971
    Number of movements built: cal. 2001 = ca. 600 // cal. 2002 = ca. 9600
    Movement diameter: 24,30 x 29,00 mm or 10 ¾ x 12 ¾ Paris Lines
    Movement height: 7,50 mm
    Average lifetime of the battery: max. 20 month
    Battery type: 313
    Number of functional jewels: 13 artificial jewels
    Oscillating frequency: 8'192 Hertz
    Adjustment system: trimming potentiometer
    Second-hand position: from the centre
    Second-hand stop-function: yes
    Date-indication: dial-opening at 3 o'clock

    This movement has some specials. One is the oscillating frequencywith 8192
    Hertz (modern Quartz movements are working wit 32768 Hertz) and the other is
    the way how the electronically impulses are made into the moving of the
    wheels. The BETA watches uses a tuning-fork-driving-gear, modern quartz-
    movement uses a stepping-electro-motor. This is the reason why the second
    hands of the watches with the calibre's 2001 and 2002 are sweeping.

    The main difference between the calibre 2001 (BETA 21) and 2002 (BETA 22) is
    the electronic and the trimmer. There is a third BETA movement named BETA 23
    which is not used by IWC in series. This movement also uses the tuning-fork-
    driving-gear but it uses a new electronic with a quartz that oscillates with
    32768 Hertz. Because these electronic is changeable to the other BETA
    movements IWC use the electronic of the BETA 23 at the repairs of the
    calibre's 2001 and 2002.

    Here are some pictures I borrowed from the internet : the gold case and a pic
    of the inside with a view on the calibre.

    Back to mine

    Here is a little video of the movement of the second hand. You will notice the
    difference between this quartz electronic and the jumping second hand of a
    modern quartz watch.

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aww0ntjp3Y

    Note : don't mistake the quartz electronic on a dial with the IWC watches with
    electronic on the dial, these have the Bulova based tuning fork movement.

  • Master
    19 Apr 2020, 1:48 p.m.

    Tonny's post of today touches an open nerve here and raises a long-standing
    debate around these quartz timepieces.

    Are these timepieces worthy of the rich legacy of IWC? Do they represent Haute
    Horologe? Are they real watches? Why is it that these watches are not deemed
    by many to be Collectors items?

    Today, we fully understand why the management in Schaffhausen needed to go
    down this route in order to save the Company then at the time, from went down
    in history as "the Quartz Crisis". A time, when watchmakers with generations
    of fine Swiss watchmaking skills and techniques, were laid off en mass - and
    those left behind in the manufactory asked (probably to their disdain) to work
    on and assemble these new-fangled quartz thingamajigs.

    Yet, if we take a close look at the quality of these watches and in looking at
    the engraving on what was probably the only single "bridge" (if one can call
    it that) in these movements that IWC staff themselves did any work on, we see
    that it was carefully done to the highest standard. The engraving is even gold
    inlayed.

    Then look agai at Tonny pictures and at the magnificent quality of the case
    work on those watches. Engineered again, to the highest of standards -
    Probus Scafusia

    Yet the question remains; is this pocket watch worthy of carrying the IWC
    name, and does it do justice to the IWC Brand name.

    The Watch :

    The watch I wish to share with you today, to compliment Tonny's fine example
    of a lesser quality movement in a higher quality case, is exactly 180 degrees
    in the opposite direction.

    The Story behind the Watch

    One evening late during the second week of February 2017 whilst in Budapest
    for work, I was in my hotel room about to retire for the night. I had an early
    morning flight back to Amsterdam, so did not want to make it too late a night.

    As was my habit and before hitting the sack, I would quickly login in to the
    IWC forum to catch up on the days posts, and then spend a half hour browsing
    the internet looking for that special IWC Pocket Watch to come up for sale,
    somewhere. However, today there were no new and or exciting pieces listed and
    I was just about to shutdown my laptop when this piece caught my eye.

    For those in the know it looked like a Cal. 97, and one in pretty fair
    condition. The seller, based in Bulgaria was listing this watch as a "Rare
    unique Gold IWC Pocket Watch", and so definitely worthy of a second look.

    But for sure only a very brief look - because this watch was clearly a fake
    IWC Pocket Watch and one to be totally ignored. In taking that fleeting closer
    look, my fist instincts were looking to be correct.

    Firstly the shape of this case. I'd personally never seen an IWC in a case
    like this.

    as well as the case back appeared to be stamped rather crudely with some
    "hieroglyphics" of sorts.

    Then secondly this for sure was not a gold watch. I was not sure which metal
    it may be, but clearly one could see that the plating was already flaking off
    on the crown bow and besides, look at that weird crown on the watch. Never
    seen something like that either on an IWC Pocket Watch.

    And last but not least - the 100% give away to me that this was a fake
    timepiece was clear to see. The inside case back bore what was definitely a
    very fake IWC logo. Not only was it way to large (I had never seen the IWC
    Probus Scafusia logo the size of a small button on any watch. If anything, I
    had always been impressed with the tiny detail in the small IWC Probus
    Scafusia logo's that they did use on their watches. No bigger than 3mm on
    average and very precise.

    And to add insult to injury, there it was in plain sight : Metal - Plaque
    or Lamine - 20 Microns

    No doubt about it, a fake. Now, we were of course aware of the risks involved
    in landing up with a fake watch out of Bulgaria and indeed Tonny and others
    had warned about this phenomenon already some 12 years previously.

    [Fake Watches from Bulgaria](/t/the-first-fake-

    ingenieurs-spottedbeware/19504/post/40334/)

    But those were wrist watches, and here clearly was the first real fake pocket
    watch out of Bulgaria. Least ways, in my humble opinion.

    However, the movement looked both legitimate and to be in good shape and I
    thought that given not many of these Cal. 97's appear on the market, that if I
    could secure it cheaply, it would be good to have for spares parts.

    So, just before I shut down for the night, I made a low but fair offer on the
    watch. Whereby, I wrote the seller a message informing him of my dismay at his
    audacity to be offering this watch for such a ridiculously expensive price,
    and that primarily the only reason I'd even consider an offer here was for the
    movement as spare parts.

    Now typically, I fall asleep within 5 minutes of putting my head down.
    However, that night I could not sleep. I kept thinking (or was it dreaming)
    that maybe this watch was real and not a fake. Something special? Doubting
    that someone would bother to assemble a fake pocket watch. I tossed and
    turned, I could not sleep.

    Then the alarm went, and it was the usual rush. Check-out at the hotel, brave
    the crazy traffic in Budapest to the airport, rush to check-in, run for the
    gate to make it aboard, and finally get to relax a little. Delay ! We missed
    the slot and are going to sit another half hour before push back at the Gate.
    I use the opportunity to check up on my emails and decide to send our Museum
    Curator David Seyffer some pictures of the faux timepiece and ask his opinion
    as to why would anyone would even want to assemble a fake IWC Pocket Watch.
    Push back, phones off and in-flight mode, and I am asleep before we are even
    in the air.

    Waking up in Amsterdam to the bump of landing t around 9.20am. Arrival to the
    gate, doors open and await your turn to disembark. I wonder if the seller had
    seen my offer and responded. Phone on, but no emails from eBay. Then, just as
    I am about to leave the plane, the familiar sound of "You have Mail".

    It's from a rather concerned Dr. David Seyffer. Was I feeling OK? What state
    of mind was I in and what was I thinking even looking at watches like the one
    I had shared with him?
    I could hear David too thinking, Bulgaria of all
    places the poor guys lost his mind.

    Whew, what a relief to know that I was not losing it - that others more in the
    know than I, agreed with me. I'm off the hook.

    NOT !!!

    By the time I reach the luggage bands I've an email from eBay. The seller
    short of words, simply had accepted my offer. Well OK I thought, it's a fake,
    but the offer I made was based on fair value for that movement so not too bad.
    And after all, if the watch does not arrive, I could always claim from PayPal
    (right?). On the train ride home, I completed the transaction by paying in
    full for the watch.

    That same afternoon I received notification that the seller had shipped the
    watch.

    Back in the home office that week, and while the watch is in transit, I decide
    to take another look at what I had bought.

    Well, it turns out that those symbols are non other than the Bulgarian
    Alphabet.

    And the writing on top of the 6H6 (which we now already know is not 6H6 but
    rather BHB), appears to be Bulgarian as well.

    So I sent out some feelers to folk who I thought may be able to read it and
    they came back and sayd it translates to: Society Balgarska narodna
    banka
    (where the H in BHB is an N) standing for National Bank of Bulgaria
    ( Българска народна банка
    )

    I then informed David Seyffer that I had actually bought this watch and of my
    findings to the text on the cases. I also shared the case serial numbers with
    him. He came back and said that the case was not IWC and asked if I had the
    movement serial number as this was not clear on the pictures.

    The watch arrived and I confirmed both serial numbers to David. This resulted
    in him reverting back to me as follows: " That is very interesting indeed;
    the movement was sold December 30th 1946 to the Bulgarian National Bank.
    The case is described as " plaque lun. 20 micrones or juane " and was
    made by Fab. Boites S.A. Biennes.

    He further wrote me, that the watch is then evidence that IWC sold after the
    second world war such watches to Bulgaria being under communist rule in that
    period, and that even though the case is not of the usual high quality finish
    as it should be for an IWC Pocket Watch, that it was interesting that IWC sold
    them to Bulgaria saying that after 1945 IWC like all other Brands in
    Switzerland had to sell as best they could.

    David told me too, that nobody prior to this in Schaffhausen (not even Mr.
    King and Mr. Meiss) knew or were aware about "plaque" cases on IWC Pocket
    Watches and that he recalled Mr. King giving him a mouthfull some 10 years
    previously, when he dared to mention the possibility. "IWC never did Plaque
    !"

    Subsequent to me finding this watch Tonny told me that he had seen them
    offered for sale before, these plated "plaque" timepieces.

    And so we see folks, no matter what; be it in the case of Tonnys ' watch
    with a lesser quality movement in a higher quality case or in this case a very
    high quality movement is a less quality case, it's all 100% Probus
    Scafusia
    .

    So yes, in the eyes of this collector it 's an Absolute YES - those Quartz
    watches are an integral part of IWC history and legacy and Tonny's two pieces
    are truely deserving of a place in the Virtual Museum.

  • Master
    19 Apr 2020, 3:33 p.m.

    "History is often determined by the unexpected".

    Is this not what is happening at this very moment? I want to quote from an
    article : 'The Illustrious Homberger Family and IWC ' ( H.J. July 2018).

    .......'Then an unknown and unexpected feature crept into Swiss horology : the
    arrival of electronic watches. First came the electronic tuning fork
    movements, followed by by quartz. The Swiss, experts in mechanical watchmaking
    for over a century, were now confronted with a potential threat: an extremely
    accurate watch made in a total different way. A peculiar concept had settled
    in the minds of some Swiss watch manufacturers : the more accurate a watch is,
    the more epensive it is to make it. While this is true for a mechanical watch,
    the future would teach that by around 1985, a quarz movement could be produced
    for 10 US dollars per piece. This misconception, but predominantly the
    reservation against investment in new technology and personnel, enabled
    companies at the other end of the world to develop and produce quartz watches
    without any noteworthy competition from the country where mechanical
    watchmaking was the main industrial core business. Hans-Ernst Homberger
    recognised the danger and in 1968 he stated . we have to create more
    opportunity for the electronic watch as by the year 2000 the customer expects
    that his watch will not deviate more than a hundredth of a second per day.
    Japan produced between 1978 and 1985 800 million of quartz watches. This
    tsunami decreased the number of workers in the Swiss watch industry from
    90,000 to 30,000 and number of companies from 1,600 to 600. Also IWC was
    struck by a financial disaster and the banks were reluctant to provide loans.
    Their comment : we have to realise that the mechanical watch is dead'.......

    Adrian,

    (alwaysiwc)

  • Master
    20 Apr 2020, 3:45 a.m.

    Thank You Tonny

    I love the "mechanics" of Beta movement. Especially the terminals, wiring and
    electronic circuitry.

  • Master
    21 Apr 2020, 7:36 a.m.

    Have to add to these obscure pieces.

    Here's my silver ref. 5810 originally sold in 1979. Only 103 pieces were made
    in silver.

    The movement is a cal. 2405.

    /Anders

  • Master
    21 Apr 2020, 9:03 a.m.

    A very rare bird !

    What's interesting here is the fact that the case is not designed to look
    1970's modern but rather to look like the pocket watches of years gone by.

  • Master
    21 Apr 2020, 9:12 a.m.

    Extremely rare Anders, I have never seen it even not in the old catalogues.

    Adrian,

    (alwaysiwc).

  • Master
    27 Apr 2020, 8:28 p.m.

    The Quartz c.2001 and the c.2002 are beside the tuning fork c.150 and c.160
    the watches showing most visible the flow of the time.

    The Quartz movements make a little bit fewer steps per second 256 Hz (8192 :
    32), compare to 300 Hz of the c.150/160.

    The classification of the Beta 21 movements is quite difficult as moste of
    them got newer "modules". I do not have the over view which ones are the most
    original ones.

    The funny thin is, at the beginning they had a 4 digit serial number. Here a
    sample

    I hope someone has an overview of the versions of the trimmer and electronic
    versions. (left side of the picture)

    In my picture, this part is not, of the one of the first version, but the
    movement it self is an early one (#3260)

    regards

    watch77

  • Master
    27 Apr 2020, 8:32 p.m.

    What a neat Quartz movement - and this informative post shows how little I
    actually know of these Beta Quartz movements.

  • Master
    28 Apr 2020, 12:25 p.m.

    A selection of Quartz pocket watches you find in the "1982 Band 1 Saemtliche
    Taschenuhren" catalog...

    I think I have seen this watch in a IWC catalog, but actually I cant find this
    pictures again....

    regards

    watch77

  • Master
    28 Apr 2020, 12:37 p.m.

    It is an early pocket watch with Quartz-Movement... Finally found in a
    Catalog....

    As most Quartz PW and 58xx Reference here Ref. 5810

    As it is not in the 1981 and 1982 Catalog you need to search in earlier
    ones...

    I think the Cal 2405 ist the first Movement used by IWC with stepper motor
    (without the "mechanical" divider), making this "odd" timi discrimination to 1
    second steps....

  • Master
    28 Apr 2020, 12:40 p.m.

    Yeah, that's mine!

    Any chance you could email me a copy of that sheet?

    /Anders

  • Master
    28 Apr 2020, 12:57 p.m.

    Absolutely great research Watch77 !

    Now Anders, can sleep better at night knowing his quartz watch is 100% genuine
    "Probus Scafusia"

  • Master
    28 Apr 2020, 2:25 p.m.

    Well Mark,

    That I knew, so my sleep wasn't disturbed ;-)

    But never saw that dealer sheet before.

    /Anders